FAA fines Sudan missionary $28,000
The Rev. Sam Childers has rescued more than 800 children from child-soldier recruiters and kidnappers, sheltering them in the orphanage he operates in Sudan’s Darfur region. Now the FAA says Childers owes the U.S. government $28,000. The Washington Times reports:
For more than a decade, he has transported needed supplies to operate the orphanage’s power generator in a clearly marked household plastic container. That is until April, when 3 quarts of motor oil, two bottles of diesel treatment and a can of spray lubricant in the crate were confiscated by airline screeners. Mr. Childers, president of World Missions Shekinah Fellowship, apologized in a subsequent letter to U.S. government officials, saying he was not aware the supplies were classified as “hazardous materials” and illegal to ship by commercial plane. The minister thought the matter was resolved, but six months later, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) notified Mr. Childers that he will be fined $28,000 for the transgression.
An ex-biker (and Hell’s Angels enforcer) who became a born-again Christian in 1992. An 2006 MSNBC story on the children of war-torn Uganda noted that Childers goes on military-style raids with militia to rescue children from Ugandan kidnappers. “I always liked to fight…,” Childers said. “I’m a preacher but I still like to fight.”
An FAA attorney told Childers she didn’t care who he is or why he tried to ship the oil and diesel — he’ll have to pay his fine. “It scared me,” Childers said. “I’ve been in war zones working for the last 10 years, but this lady had me scared.”















Click to Print
Include Comments











back to top22 Comments to “FAA fines Sudan missionary $28,000”
I wonder if he could submit to a TSA full body cavity search in lieu of fine. They like that kind of stuff and he would still get reamed.
Report comment to moderator
It could have been much worse.
He could have been carrying personal toiletries in containers larger than three ounces, in a Ziploc™ bag larger than 1 quart, onto the aircraft:
http://www.kiphawleyisanidiot.com
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2006/08/17/flying_toilet_terror_labs
But considering that the guy wasn’t endangering his fellow passengers (and untold thousands on the ground) with 4-oz. containers of Listermint or 4.5-oz. tubes of Preparation H™, I think the FAA should just let him off with a warning this time.
Report comment to moderator
“Stupid is as stupid does” Forrest Gump
Report comment to moderator
Llama you post made me laugh out loud. Thanks for starting my morning with a laugh.
Report comment to moderator
He should get a lawyer. He can beat this.
Report comment to moderator
he was not aware the supplies were classified as “hazardous materials” and illegal to ship by commercial plane.
As a frequent international air passenger, he deserves to pay simply for claiming he did not know the rules. He knows them now. One look at his passport, and customs would have laughed in his face. Years ago, airport checkers confiscated from my luggage an empty aluminum fuel bottle that had been rinsed with rubbing alcohol and was well aired out but still gave off the slightest hint of fuel odor. Not only can you not take anything that burns, you can’t take anything that ever held something that burns. Rambo might have received more sympathy if he had acknowledged the rules and merely reported the previous occasions in which TSA agents had waived the rules for his transportation of the products.
Report comment to moderator
Ignorance of the law is no excuse. He admits to breaking it. He must pay the fine. Missionaries don’t receive “get out of jail free” cards.
Report comment to moderator
If you’d care to follow this story for the next few months to a final resolution Stephen, it’s possible you’ll find that one way or another God will make your prediction worthless. Considering this man’s mission of compassion it’s quite possible that the bureaucratic red tape and the intentions of the hardened hearts stringing it in his path will be either overridden or the fines paid anonymously.
Report comment to moderator
P.Pat,
Glad I could help. I just love win – win solutions to difficult problems lawyers would never come up with
In truthfulness, he should at least make the offer to ream himself and if this solution would be acceptable to the FAA. When they say no, his lawyer can at least point out that another more suitable solution was offered, rejected and make the FAA look like the brutal beasts they appear to be in this case.
Sadly, if the FAA gives a break to this guy they will set a precedent for others escape punishment who may have had other intentions than keeping a generator running for poor foreign kids and orphans.
Report comment to moderator
Irrelevant, Rond. If someone wants to pay the fine for him, by all means let them do so, but the fine must be paid either way. To be equal under the law means that missionaries don’t get special treatment.
Report comment to moderator
Stephen, I’m not sure this argument is so much about whether or not he should be fined as it is about how big the fine is. At least that’s my problem with the story. $28K seems like an awful lot, especially when you consider how easy a lot of “real” criminals are let off.
Report comment to moderator
Kevin, the fine does seem excessive and I’d have no problem with a review of how it’s assessed. In that case, however, Lynn’s extra information on him as missionary would be irrelevant, so I presumed from the context that the monetary amount of the fine was not at issue. If it is, then we’re in complete agreement.
Report comment to moderator
Stephen, what if he was just a nice guy and not a missionary? Would you give him any special consideration based on his humanitarian work?
Report comment to moderator
No.
Report comment to moderator
What if he were Muslim?
Report comment to moderator
Thomas,
Do Muslims Sects have missionaries?
Report comment to moderator
LLAMA, no they just kill people who aren’t them.
Report comment to moderator
16 & 17
Ha ha, and Yuck Yuck.. Very funny.
But it is a serious question…. I’m guessing that the willingness of people here to defend this person is contingent on the fact he’s a Christian, and that that willingness would pretty much evaporate if he were a Muslim clergyman.
Oh, and yeah, I do agree that the fine is excessive. He should’ve known better, with current realities being what they are. But when determined that everything was OK, they should have let it drop.
I’m jsut willing to bet, though,we just wouldn’t see this as news here, were he a secular humanitarian, or a religous memver of another faith (Muslim just as an example, but you could include Hindu or Taoist or whatever). Folks here woulg be rushing to justify the fine, not condemn it.
Report comment to moderator
Thomas, I wasn’t joking.
Shiite martyrs get 72 virgins for killing Sunnis.
Sunni martyrs get 72 virgins for killing Shiites.
They both get virgins for killing Christians, Jews, Kurds, Armenians, and anyone else that isn’t them.
But you’re wrong about your last statement. A similar event that happened to someone else might be ignored because it isn’t one of us. But nobody here would think it was anything but excessive and basically a dumb thing to do.
A few years ago, they were debating putting the security inspectors under civil service in order to increase federal union membership and Democratic party strength. I told someone, “If you think Hitler or Stalin was bad, if you think Pol Pot was bad, wait ’till you see a GS-3 with authority.” You don’t have to be smart to mess up someone’s life.
Report comment to moderator
$28,000 seems a bit excessive. I guess they need it to pay those TSA guys that missed the same stuff for ten years and finally caught it. They’re worth every penny.
Report comment to moderator
I don’t care if it were a Muslim or an atheist. If he’s out there rescuing kids, then I say he should be forgiven.
Report comment to moderator
Stephen,
You should understand what irrelevancy is before you start tossing the term around. Irrelevancy would be your implication that missionaries get special treatment under the law they don’t deserve.
If the fine is paid, from whatever source, or not because it was legally dismissed, and/or jail time is served because no other option was available, is what I believe will be the final resolution here because I fully expect as much from someone with the apparent credentials of Mr. Childers — and is completely relevant. Thus, we must wait and see before snarkily disparaging any one individual or group of people with whom he may be associated.
If “favorable” resolution happens by arrangement of God — who could easily find account bookkeeping errors enabling Mr. Childer’s to write a check — would be something none of us will understand and you probably wouldn’t acknowledge. Such are the ways of God in dealing with His people — my only point.
BTW, who does deserve “get out of jail free cards”? Shouldn’t we all pay our debts and keep our accounts clear?
Report comment to moderator
back to topJoin The Conversation
You need to be a registered user of WORLDmag.com's Community section to "join the conversation."
If you are not a member yet, what are you waiting for? Register / Login Now!