Comments on: Primaries 101

By: Mr_Meaner

Mr_Meaner — Thu, 18 Oct 2007 23:19:01 +0000

There is no doubt in my mind that Duncan Hunter is the best choice among all of the candidates.
Which is exactly why you never see him on any MSM broadcasts. If he was given too much exposure, he would wipe up the floor with all of these other guys.

PS I guess that page was harmless enough..
But Slate?..
Gee, might as well get information from The Daily Worker

By: Random Name

Random Name — Thu, 18 Oct 2007 20:45:05 +0000

Let’s draw names from a hat to see whose hat gets thrown in the ring. Or we could run each candidate up a flagpole to see who hangs best.

By: Sawgunner

Sawgunner — Thu, 18 Oct 2007 20:36:19 +0000

Has anyone seen the poll that you fill out? It helps you determine which candidate has views most closely in line with your own.
Several friends have done it and they are amazed to see themselves identified with Duncan Hunter.
Looks like it will be Hillary/Kucinich for the Demo nom.

By: Frank in Phoenix

Frank in Phoenix — Thu, 18 Oct 2007 20:15:16 +0000

HSK: … with less punditry to skew your interpretation of skewed polls.

FRANK: “Skewed polls”?

What/

Way to let the air outta my tires …

By: Peter L

Peter L — Thu, 18 Oct 2007 19:26:35 +0000

That should be *Agreed. PREVIEW PLEASE!

By: Peter L

Peter L — Thu, 18 Oct 2007 19:25:45 +0000

Greed, trr. It is time for the parties to rethink the method of picking the candidates for the highest office, the “most powerful (person) on earth”.

By: trr

trr — Thu, 18 Oct 2007 18:24:33 +0000

“Stay interested”? That implies getting interested in the first place. Probably not a good assumption, Harrison.